<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Entertainium &#187; The Beatles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entertainium.org/tag/the-beatles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entertainium.org</link>
	<description>Critical Opinions on the Entertainment World of Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>English</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ringo Starr: Y Not Review</title>
		<link>http://entertainium.org/music/ringo-starr-y-not-review/</link>
		<comments>http://entertainium.org/music/ringo-starr-y-not-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt LaMagna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul McCartney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ringo Starr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y Not]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainium.org/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After The Beatles broke up, Paul McCartney found success with Wings, George Harrison released the acclaimed All Things Must Pass, and John Lennon left an indelible mark on the 1970s by creating the longest-lasting peace anthem in music history. Ringo’s contributions to the music landscape, while varied, had little meaningful impact outside “Photograph”, from 1973’s Ringo. While Ringo’s Y Not won’t change this fact, the album is still an enjoyable listen. It is a must-buy for Beatles fans and worth checking out for anyone who likes the nostalgic pop-rock that Ringo offers. Ringo’s best work has come from collaborative efforts, and Y Not is another example of successful collaboration. The album opens with the powerful “Fill in the Blanks”, which features Joe Walsh of The Eagles on guitar. Paul McCartney is featured throughout the album as well, playing bass on “Peace Dream” and performing a duet with Ringo on “Walk With You.” In these tracks, Ringo’s vocal ability is enhanced…with a little help from his friends.  In the other tracks, Ringo shows his versatility, transitioning from driving rock on “The Other Side of Liverpool” to the softer tones of “Time”. In all, Y Not is a familiar journey with Ringo Starr. It certainly won’t be album of the year, but it certainly is an enjoyable listen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After The Beatles broke up, Paul McCartney found success with Wings, George Harrison released the acclaimed <em>All Things Must Pass</em>, and John Lennon left an indelible mark on the 1970s by creating the longest-lasting peace anthem in music history. Ringo’s contributions to the music landscape, while varied, had little meaningful impact outside “Photograph”, from 1973’s <em>Ringo. </em>While Ringo’s <em>Y Not </em>won’t change this fact, the album is still an enjoyable listen. It is a must-buy for Beatles fans and worth checking out for anyone who likes the nostalgic pop-rock that Ringo offers.</p>
<p>Ringo’s best work has come from collaborative efforts, and <em>Y Not</em> is another example of successful collaboration. The album opens with the powerful “Fill in the Blanks”, which features Joe Walsh of The Eagles on guitar. Paul McCartney is featured throughout the album as well, playing bass on “Peace Dream” and performing a duet with Ringo on “Walk With You.” In these tracks, Ringo’s vocal ability is enhanced…with a little help from his friends.  In the other tracks, Ringo shows his versatility, transitioning from driving rock on “The Other Side of Liverpool” to the softer tones of “Time”.</p>
<p>In all, <em>Y Not</em> is a familiar journey with Ringo Starr. It certainly won’t be album of the year, but it certainly is an enjoyable listen.</p>
<div class=""><div style="text-align:left; padding: 0; margin: 0; background: url(http://entertainium.org/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/stars/oxygen/stars46.png); height: 46px; width: 230px;"><div style="background: url(http://entertainium.org/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/stars/oxygen/stars46.png) bottom left; padding: 0; margin: 0; height: 46px; width: 184px;"></div></div></div>
<div class="shr-publisher-760"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://entertainium.org/music/ringo-starr-y-not-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best of the Decade: Music in Review</title>
		<link>http://entertainium.org/music/the-best-of-the-decade-music-in-review/</link>
		<comments>http://entertainium.org/music/the-best-of-the-decade-music-in-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt LaMagna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[98 Degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backstreet Boys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boy Bands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coldplay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Lachey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elvis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eminem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonas Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Timberlake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Led Zeppelin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lil Wayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Jonas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Lachey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radiohead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TBOTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Best of the Decade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainium.org/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In about one month, the decade with a name that hasn’t been decided will come to an end. (As an aside, what are we going to call this decade? There’s no convenient numbering system like the eighties or nineties. Do we go with the aughts? The Robert Parrishes? The one with the global financial crisis?) So, to get you ready for our end-of-the-decade feature, I thought it would be helpful to list some of the events that happened this decade in music: Out of the fourteen members of the “Big 3” boy bands of the 1990’s, only one, Justin Timberlake, had any success after the dissolution of the group. That number jumps to two if you count Drew Lachey winning Dancing with the Stars. It jumps to three if you count Nick Lachey marrying Jessica Simpson and chronicling their life on the short-lived reality show Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica. And it jumps to four if you count Nick Carter’s even-shorter-lived reality TV series House of Carters, which featured such memorable moments as the time Nick and Aaron fought over such pressing topics as dating Paris Hilton and the no music after 12 o’clock rule (NSFW-language): The National Academy of Recording Arts &#38; Sciences, in an effort to rectify past mistakes of not giving Grammys to Led Zeppelin and Steely Dan when they were relevant music groups, showed its age and awarded Grammys for Album of the Year to Steely Dan in 2001 and Robert Plant (and Allison Krauss) in 2009. In arguably the two best years for music in the decade, two aging representatives for the deification of classic rock were given awards instead of Radiohead or Eminem in 2001 or Coldplay, Lil Wayne, or Radiohead (again!) in 2009. In a shocker, the general public complained that the music from this decade sucked. This opinion was a direct contrast to the music of the nineties, which people said was…nevermind, people thought music then sucked as well (and in the eighties, seventies, sixties, fifties…). For audiences reading Entertainium in 2020, get ready for the Nick Jonas Grammy Award for Album of the Year! Don’t say we didn’t warn you. Speaking of Nick Jonas, the Jonas Brothers go from playing an anti-drug concert at my high school in 2005 to playing at the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade the very next year. This is honestly the biggest music story of the decade. They went from basically booed off of a high school auditorium stage to fame, fortune, and a hilarious South Park parody. By the way, I personally think that their music is awful. If I ever change this opinion, feel free to try and to do to me what those guys in Project Mayhem attempted to do when Edward Norton was trying to expose what the true purpose of the project was. And as a summation of music in the decade, here is the list of the top 20 best-selling music acts of the decade: http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/34074/chart-watch-extra-the-top-20-album-sellers-of-the-2000s Interesting facts supporting the “this decade sucked” theory: The...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In about one month, the decade with a name that hasn’t been decided will come to an end.</p>
<p>(As an aside, what are we going to call this decade? There’s no convenient numbering system like the eighties or nineties. Do we go with the aughts? The Robert Parrishes? The one with the global financial crisis?)</p>
<p>So, to get you ready for our end-of-the-decade feature, I thought it would be helpful to list some of the events that happened this decade in music:</p>
<ul>
<li>Out of the fourteen members of the “Big 3” boy bands of the 1990’s, only one, Justin Timberlake, had any success after the dissolution of the group.
<ul>
<li>That number jumps to two if you count Drew Lachey winning <em>Dancing with the Stars</em>.</li>
<li>It jumps to three if you count Nick Lachey marrying Jessica Simpson and chronicling their life on the short-lived reality show <em>Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica.</em></li>
<li>And it jumps to four if you count Nick Carter’s even-shorter-lived reality TV series <em>House of Carters</em>, which featured such memorable moments as the time Nick and Aaron fought over such pressing topics as dating Paris Hilton and the no music after 12 o’clock rule (NSFW-language):</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WUIJvgW0pV4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WUIJvgW0pV4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<ul>
<li>The National Academy of Recording Arts &amp; Sciences, in an effort to rectify past mistakes of not giving Grammys to Led Zeppelin and Steely Dan when they were relevant music groups, showed its age and awarded Grammys for Album of the Year to Steely Dan in 2001 and Robert Plant (and Allison Krauss) in 2009. In arguably the two best years for music in the decade, two aging representatives for the deification of classic rock were given awards instead of Radiohead or Eminem in 2001 or Coldplay, Lil Wayne, or Radiohead (again!) in 2009.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In a shocker, the general public complained that the music from this decade sucked. This opinion was a direct contrast to the music of the nineties, which people said was…nevermind, people thought music then sucked as well (and in the eighties, seventies, sixties, fifties…). For audiences reading Entertainium in 2020, get ready for the Nick Jonas Grammy Award for Album of the Year! Don’t say we didn’t warn you.</li>
</ul>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 290px"><img title="Marshall Mathers LP" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51lYz3GWPnL._SL500_AA280_.jpg" alt="How about a kiss for your cousin Dupree would certainly have a different meaning coming from his mouth" width="280" height="280" /><p class="wp-caption-text">No guitar licks and references to &quot;Cousin Dupree&quot; here</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Speaking of Nick Jonas, the Jonas Brothers go from playing an anti-drug concert at my high school in 2005 to playing at the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade the very next year. This is honestly the biggest music story of the decade. They went from basically booed off of a high school auditorium stage to fame, fortune, and a hilarious <em>South Park </em>parody.
<ul>
<li>By the way, I personally think that their music is awful. If I ever change this opinion, feel free to try and to do to me what those guys in Project Mayhem attempted to do when Edward Norton was trying to expose what the true purpose of the project was.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>And as a summation of music in the decade, here is the list of the top 20 best-selling music acts of the decade: <a href="http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/34074/chart-watch-extra-the-top-20-album-sellers-of-the-2000s">http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/34074/chart-watch-extra-the-top-20-album-sellers-of-the-2000s</a>
<ul>
<li>Interesting facts supporting the “this decade sucked” theory: The Beatles, which had not released any new material in this decade, were the number-two act of the decade. Most of this was due to the release of <em>1, </em>a compilation of number 1 hits that moved over 11 million units and set a precedent for every musician to come out with a number 1 hits collection (see <em>Elv1s: 30 #1 Hits, Michael Jackson: Number Ones</em>, <em>Rocket Man – Number Ones, Number 1’s Stevie Wonder, </em>and <em>Conway Twitty- Number 1’s</em>).
<ul>
<li>As an aside on the “Number Ones” phenomenon, there are only a few artists (namely The Beatles and Elvis) that the criterion allows a greatest hits collection that encompasses their entire career. Stevie’s collection leaves out some hits from the sixties and eighties and Elton John’s collection doesn’t have “Levon”. Most egregiously, Jackson’s collection includes nothing before <em>Off the Wall </em>except for a re-release of “Ben”, completely ignoring his work with The Jackson 5, the Jacksons, and his solo work for Motown (but, at least it has “Earth Song” and “One More Chance”!)</li>
</ul>
<p><div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 290px"><img title="MJ Ones" src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000DJE9R.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg" alt="Not Included: ABC, I Want You Back, or, the biggest omission of them all, the song from Free Willy." width="280" height="280" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Not Included: &quot;ABC&quot;, &quot;I Want You Back&quot;, or, the biggest omission of them all, the song from Free Willy.</p></div></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>***</p>
<p>So, what is Entertainium’s end of the decade feature? Every Sunday, we will have a decade in review primer to get you ready for Tuesday- the day where we reveal the best of the decade in music, movies, television, and video games.</p>
<p>Here’s the schedule:</p>
<ul>
<li>Music: Primer 11/22 (today!), Album of the decade 11/24</li>
<li>Television: Primer 11/29, Program of the decade 12/1</li>
<li>Video Games: Primer 12/6, Game of the decade 12/8</li>
<li>Movies: Primer 12/13, Film of the decade 12/15</li>
</ul>
<p>This feature will bring an exciting conclusion to the decade and we hope that you continue reading our site through the end of this decade and the start of the next!</p>
<p><em>“The Best of the Decade” feature will be Matt’s primary focus on Entertainium until the end of the year. Follow him on twitter at www.twitter.com/lamagnam</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-678"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://entertainium.org/music/the-best-of-the-decade-music-in-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Beatles: Rock Band Review</title>
		<link>http://entertainium.org/gaming/the-beatles-rock-band-review/</link>
		<comments>http://entertainium.org/gaming/the-beatles-rock-band-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt LaMagna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playstation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Harrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lennon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul McCartney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ringo Starr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock Band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beatles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainium.org/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beatles: Rock Band holds the distinction of the most anticipated video game ever. All of the blockbusters such as Grand Theft Auto IV, Halo 3, and the yearly release of Madden cannot hold a candle to the amount of hype that The Beatles: Rock Band received over this past summer. The appearance of Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr for a grand total of about two minutes was main story of E3 2009. The game was featured on television shows that wouldn’t normally give thirty seconds to video games on a normal day (Today and The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien are two that instantly come to mind). The hype isn’t unexpected. The Beatles defined a generation and constantly innovated, expanding the limits and expectations of what music could do. Even after their dissolution in 1971 and the deaths of John Lennon in 1980 and George Harrison in 2001, their music has endured through the generations and has influenced contemporary music. Yet, there is potential for such a game to fail. Music games that have featured a band-specific focus have not fared well critically. Guitar Hero: Aerosmith, Guitar Hero: Metallica, and AC/DC Live: Rock Band have not been able to equal the same Metacritic scores as their full band competitors: Guitar Hero World Tour, Guitar Hero 5, Rock Band, and Rock Band 2. Luckily, The Beatles: Rock Band does not fall into the same pitfalls as the band-specific games before it. It plays exceptionally well, utilizes the license effectively, and offers tremendous fan service. However, there seems to be room for improvement, especially in the areas of song selection and innovation. The best compliment that can be paid to the game is that it continues in the tradition of excellence that has characterized the Rock Band series. Every gameplay related aspect of the Rock Band series remains intact, with a few slight modifications. This statement means that there is no over-charting, broken vocals, or dumb shared star power meter. Basically, the compliment is that it plays like Rock Band, not Guitar Hero. Additionally, the vocal section has been expanded to include vocal harmonies. Up to three players can sing a different vocal part depending on the song. Because the riffs of The Beatles’ songs are not complicated, the game encourages the player to try their hand at singing and playing at the same time (to that end, the premium edition of the game bundles a microphone stand). However, if the game consisted solely of the songs of The Beatles with a traditional Rock Band overlay, players would be disappointed. Suffice it to say, the game does not slouch in license utilization. Every song has a unique setting, and throughout the career mode, players experience Beatlemania firsthand. They see The Beatles’ humble beginnings in the Cavern Club, the British Invasion of The Ed Sullivan Show, to the pandemonium of the 1965 Concert at Shea Stadium, the 1966 concert at Budokan, Abbey Road Studios, and the concert on the Apple Corps rooftop....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class=""><div style="text-align:left; padding: 0; margin: 0; background: url(http://entertainium.org/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/stars/oxygen/stars46.png); height: 46px; width: 230px;"><div style="background: url(http://entertainium.org/wp-content/plugins/gd-star-rating/stars/oxygen/stars46.png) bottom left; padding: 0; margin: 0; height: 46px; width: 230px;"></div></div></div>
<p><em>The Beatles: Rock Band</em> holds the distinction of the most anticipated video game ever.  All of the blockbusters such as <em>Grand Theft Auto IV, Halo 3</em>, and the yearly release of <em>Madden</em> cannot hold a candle to the amount of hype that <em>The Beatles: Rock Band</em> received over this past summer. The appearance of Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr for a grand total of about two minutes was main story of E3 2009. The game was featured on television shows that wouldn’t normally give thirty seconds to video games on a normal day (<em>Today</em> and <em>The Tonight Show with Conan O’Brien</em> are two that instantly come to mind).</p>
<p>The hype isn’t unexpected. The Beatles defined a generation and constantly innovated, expanding the limits and expectations of what music could do. Even after their dissolution in 1971 and the deaths of John Lennon in 1980 and George Harrison in 2001, their music has endured through the generations and has influenced contemporary music.</p>
<p>Yet, there is potential for such a game to fail. Music games that have featured a band-specific focus have not fared well critically. <em>Guitar Hero: Aerosmith, Guitar Hero: Metallica,</em> and <em>AC/DC Live: Rock Band</em> have not been able to equal the same Metacritic scores as their full band competitors: <em>Guitar Hero World Tour, Guitar Hero 5, Rock Band</em>, and <em>Rock Band 2.</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 489px"><em><img title="Instruments" src="http://consequenceofsound.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/rockband.jpg" alt="The instruments look great and play like the Rock Band 2 ones. For some, this fact is a negative more than it is a positive." width="479" height="268" /></em><p class="wp-caption-text">The instruments look great and play like the Rock Band 2 ones. For some, this fact is a negative more than it is a positive.</p></div>
<p>Luckily, <em>The Beatles: Rock Band</em> does not fall into the same pitfalls as the band-specific games before it.  It plays exceptionally well, utilizes the license effectively, and offers tremendous fan service. However, there seems to be room for improvement, especially in the areas of song selection and innovation.</p>
<p>The best compliment that can be paid to the game is that it continues in the tradition of excellence that has characterized the <em>Rock Band</em> series. Every gameplay related aspect of the <em>Rock Band</em> series remains intact, with a few slight modifications. This statement means that there is no over-charting, broken vocals, or dumb shared star power meter. Basically, the compliment is that it plays like <em>Rock Band</em>, not <em>Guitar Hero</em>. Additionally, the vocal section has been expanded to include vocal harmonies. Up to three players can sing a different vocal part depending on the song. Because the riffs of The Beatles’ songs are not complicated, the game encourages the player to try their hand at singing and playing at the same time (to that end, the premium edition of the game bundles a microphone stand).</p>
<p>However, if the game consisted solely of the songs of The Beatles with a traditional <em>Rock Band</em> overlay, players would be disappointed. Suffice it to say, the game does not slouch in license utilization. Every song has a unique setting, and throughout the career mode, players experience Beatlemania firsthand. They see The Beatles’ humble beginnings in the Cavern Club, the British Invasion of T<em>he Ed Sullivan Show</em>, to the pandemonium of the 1965 Concert at Shea Stadium, the 1966 concert at Budokan, Abbey Road Studios, and the concert on the Apple Corps rooftop. Each setting is recreated accurately and with careful attention to detail. The wardrobes of the Fab Four match what they wore at each of the actual concert venues. For the songs that were not played live, a “dreamscape” enables the songs to come to life in a fantasy world. The outfits from <em>The Magical Mystery Tour</em> make an appearance in “I Am The Walrus” and “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” gently glosses over the fact that Ringo quit the band when the song was recorded (that’s probably for the best).</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img title="Sullivan" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_TdAA3hQgE7c/SiVXaf5qEcI/AAAAAAAABII/fUXpCUydONI/s400/beatles-ed-sullivan-460-100-460-70.jpg" alt="Well be coast to coast with our favorite host...Ed Sullivan!" width="400" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;We&#39;ll be coast to coast with our favorite host...Ed Sullivan!&quot;</p></div>
<p>The recreated settings don’t begin to scratch the tip of the fan service iceberg. Rare records are offered as rewards for progress throughout the career mode. Diligent fans can listen to The Beatles’ Christmas fan club record and view outtakes of the band rehearsing for <em>The Ed Sullivan Show</em> concert that launched the British Invasion, for example. Additionally, the inclusion of new remasters of every song represents the first chance for fans to hear The Beatles in rich clarity (the bass in “I Saw Her Standing There” just kicks, there is no other word for it). Simply put, the fan service in <em>The Beatles: Rock Band</em> makes <em>Super Smash Bros. Brawl</em> look like an absolute joke.</p>
<p>This game is not without fault, though. As <em>American Idol</em> judge Randy Jackson would say: it’s all about song choice. Though the game avoids the pitfalls of previous band-centric games by sticking to the main band’s catalog (there are no songs by “friends of the band”), some of the songs have no business being in this game. One such song is “Within You Without You/Tomorrow Never Knows”. This track is off of 2006’s <em>Love</em> album, which is a composition of clever remixes and cues for the show performed by Cirque du Soleil. The song is a good song, but it is easy to question the judgment of including a song created after half of the group passed away. The album <em>Help</em>! is underrepresented though it marked an important turning point for the band’s sound (folk rock and the expansion of the traditional rock and roll music). Additionally, the final number of 45 songs leaves something to be desired as the career mode can be completed in only a few hours. Though downloadable content will remedy the relatively small amount of songs, the first real batch will not be released until late October and it favors the overrepresented late Beatles catalog by a heavy margin.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the <em>Rock Band</em> platform does not match the innovation that characterized the music of The Beatles. Aside from adding the vocal harmonies, the core gameplay mechanic hasn’t changed. It should have. On a considerable amount of songs, four distinct parts were played aside from vocals: lead guitar, rhythm guitar, bass, and drums. However, the only guitar option is simply titled “guitar”. John and George did not play the same part on “I Wanna Be Your Man”, yet the game only offers one choice to the player. For a band that pushed the envelope of accepted musical norms, one could expect that a video game developer could push the envelope of accepted video game conventions. There is no hard and fast rule that says a game must only use four controllers, and if there is, <em>The Beatles: Rock Band</em> represented a perfect opportunity to change it.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 463px"><img title="Beatles Live" src="http://blog.mlive.com/soundcheck/2007/10/large_beatles64.jpg" alt="Three stringed instruments there...too bad you can only play two" width="453" height="406" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Three stringed instruments there...too bad you can only play two</p></div>
<p>Yet, when examining a game such as this one, it is evident that the pros outweigh the cons by a significant margin. The negatives of the game don’t make the game unappealing. Rather, they only represent grievances particular to my musical tastes or a missed opportunity that was never really on the table. The game still stands incredibly well on its own merits and should be played and enjoyed by all music and video game fans.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-501"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://entertainium.org/gaming/the-beatles-rock-band-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

